Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federica Urgesi vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Urgesi vs Peeters analysis and find out who is favored!
Federica Urgesi vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Urgesi 0 - 0 Peeters
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Urgesi has won 40.08% of points on his second serve, while Peeters has won 40.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Urgesi, in recent form, has won 57.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peeters has won 57.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.58% and 42.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Urgesi has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peeters has saved 56.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Urgesi has won 39.29% of matches played (W/L 11/ 17), with Peeters winning 50.91% (W/L 28/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Urgesi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 36/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Urgesi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 31.58% of matches (W/L 6/ 13), where as Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Urgesi has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.46 while Peeters has played against players with an average rank of 118.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Urgesi has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peeters has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Urgesi has converted 56.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peeters has converted 48.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
838
Rank
818
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
43% (27-36)
Career Total W/L
56% (75-58)
50% (5-5)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federica Urgesi | Anouck Vrancken Peeters |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (5/5) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (12/12) | 53% (27/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (116/111) | 54% (241/205) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.64 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 138 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:18 | 1:41:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 316.7 | 138.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (405/662) | 60% (857/1417) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (229/405) | 62% (533/857) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (103/257) | 41% (227/560) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (47/83) | 49% (93/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (300/614) | 49% (641/1318) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 53% (9/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 9% (11/1) |
Federica Urgesi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Federica Urgesi
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Marina Melnikova
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
54%
(
52 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Duru Soke
Player
Federica Urgesi
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
36 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
103)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Verena Meliss
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Francesca Pace
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
77%
(
10 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Federica Urgesi
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martina Spigarelli
Player
Federica Urgesi
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
46%
(
22 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
55%
(
35 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
59 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Zi Ying Ruan
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Tilda Hessleryd
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Cecilie Wiche
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
16
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Urgesi Vs Peeters Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
